To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 5034
5033  |  5035
Subject: 
Re: Trying to understand Socialism
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 17 Mar 2000 17:38:21 GMT
Viewed: 
357 times
  
Steve,

Steve Bliss wrote:

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bill Farkas wrote:

But this is not a socialist country.

I think you need to recheck things a bit.  The US has a number of
Socialist features.  'Socialist' isn't a black-and-white, yes-or-no
thing.

Well, maybe what Bill is saying that this county wasn't started out
socialistic, but it seems to be getting there. Socialism is a black and
white definition, however. Any Political Science / Government class will
tell you.

Scott S.
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Scott E. Sanburn-> ssanburn@cleanweb.net
Systems Administrator-Affiliated Engineers -> http://www.aeieng.com
LEGO Page -> http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Station/3372/legoindex.html
Home Page -> http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Station/3372/index.html



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Trying to understand
 
(...) I think you need to recheck things a bit. The US has a number of Socialist features. 'Socialist' isn't a black-and-white, yes-or-no thing. Steve (24 years ago, 17-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

139 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR