Subject:
|
Re: Due Process
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 17 Mar 2000 13:16:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1380 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes:
>
>
> "Scott E. Sanburn" wrote:
>
> > To All,
> >
> > I read a fascinating article in Design Systems about how restaurants
> > handle smoking / non smoking areas. Since I work in the Architectural /
> > Mechanical Engineering realm, most engineers design for certain CFM's
> > for certain areas, the smoking areas would naturally have more drawn out
> > for the smoke. However, once the contractor gets the prints, this is one
> > of the cost downs most contractors go for, the additional cost of the
> > smoking ductwork and exhaust. I guess in Liberatopia, a restaurant would
> > want to make sure the smoking and non smoking areas stay clear of each
> > other, and also have enough negative pressure to suck out the smoke.
>
> I've always wondered if this was something that was implemented in the design
> phase or after
> the fact--it's interesting to hear the reality. My uncle is an architect in
> A^2 and has
> built or remodeled private residences and public buildings since the 1970s,
> and he's talked
> about some of the shortcuts contractors may take in materials or techniques.
> I had no idea,
> however, that this was something the contractor could change unilaterally. Is
> it unilateral?
>
> Hmm...in a Libertopia, wouldn't we then have to contend with additional
> categories of
> "smoke-friendliness" in places of business, given decriminilization and
> deregulation of other
> oft-smoked substances? It's an interesting thought to roll around.
> (Imagining, while typing
> this, the ventilation equivalent of the Get Smart "cone of silence" descending
"Aaahh yes, the o l d cone of silence trick!"
> over the
> "marijuana section"...) In Amsterdam, it seems to be handled with a place
> being either
> pot-friendly or not depending on its own declaration, but the places that are
> also appear to
> rely upon that as the claim-to-fame for their business, so it may not provide
> an accurate
> measure with respect to the hypothetical scenario. (I've never gone into one,
> so I can't
> speak to the ventilation issue in practice.)
>
> best
>
> LFB
I was in Amsterdam in 89 and they have two Hard Rock Cafes - one for smokes and
one for drinks. My friends and I walked into the wrong one by mistake - which
being on active duty at the time could have been a big mistake - they didn't
seem to have *any* ventilation (which if you think about is the "perfect"
design for that type of establishment). The smoke was so thick you could barely
see, we all said we felt a little buzz after the few seconds we had been in
there. It was a very interesting experience.
Bill
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Due Process
|
| (...) I've always wondered if this was something that was implemented in the design phase or after the fact--it's interesting to hear the reality. My uncle is an architect in A^2 and has built or remodeled private residences and public buildings (...) (27 years ago, 17-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
139 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
