To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 4845
4844  |  4846
Subject: 
Re: 3. What exactly is bigotry? More definitions. Trolling admitted.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 13 Mar 2000 17:46:37 GMT
Viewed: 
1763 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Todd Lehman wrote:

There's an old phrase -- "That's the exception that proves the rule."

[snip examples of stereotyping]

The "rule" being referred to or implied is a fallacy, a stereotype.

I thought that old saying came from English grammar, where every rule
has any number of exceptions.  The exceptions don't invalidate the rule,
they're just exceptions.

Personally, I think the 'old phrase' came from grade school teachers who
were tired of explaining *why* English grammer is so inconsistent, so
they started acting like rules *needed* exceptions.  More likely, the
teachers tended to not know the reasons, and fell back on some sophistry
to shut the kids up.

Anyway, I never interpreted the old phrase as implying the rule in
question was *bad*, it's just an admission that there are exceptions
everywhere.

Steve



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 3. What exactly is bigotry? More definitions. Trolling admitted.
 
(...) There's an old phrase -- "That's the exception that proves the rule." Example: "All tough cops have moustaches." "All?" "Yeah, all. Well, except for this one cop I talked to once -- he didn't have a moustache... But all the others do!" "He was (...) (25 years ago, 10-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

541 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR