Subject:
|
Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 Mar 2000 12:26:13 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
sgore@superonline.STOPSPAMMERScom
|
Viewed:
|
1491 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> That's right, it's actively bad for people to be RELIGIOUS and the more
> RELIGOUS they are, the worse off they are. Further, it's actively bad
> for a society to be influenced by ANY RELIGION and the more influenced
> it is, the worse off it is. IMHO.
I tried to make it more clear and more universal, as being a former
Muslim...:-)
Selçuk
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?
|
| To the reader, in the below quote Selçuk changed my words in a way that I don't agree with. He did it to make a point, I'm not mad that he did it or anything and no apology or retraction is necessary (to forestall any). (...) I don't agree. I think (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?
|
| (...) Cite, please. The rational evidence pointed FOR it being round, it was the christian church that was suppressing it to enforce a flat earth, terracentric viewpoint, as I recall. As far back as we can go in history, we have evidence that people (...) (24 years ago, 10-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
541 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
