Debate : 4647


Off-Topic / Debate / 4647	4646 \| 4648

Subject:	Re: Is God gay? (was Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Tue, 7 Mar 2000 00:16:44 GMT
Viewed:	1523 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Edward Sanburn writes: > Wow, Ed, that was not only not funny, it was pointless. Great job. > Really. I thought it was the funniest thing I'd read in several weeks. --Todd

Message has 2 Replies:

		Re: Is God gay? (was Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?)
(...) That's great. Scott S. ___...___ Scott E. Sanburn-> ssanburn@cleanweb.net Systems Administrator-Affiliated Engineers -> (URL) Page -> (URL) Page -> (URL) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

		Re: Is God gay? (was Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?)
(...) Very amusing, although one doesn't need to be gay to have those thoughts about Tammy Baker ;-) Here's something that might crack you up too. I laughed myself stupid for quite some time. (URL) the author of the site where it's hosted thinks (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Is God gay? (was Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?)
(...) of (...) [megasnip] (...) Top 10 Reasons God is Not Gay: 10. A gay god would never have allowed catholisism to exist in its current 14th century state of mind. 9. A gay god would have hymns that sound more like showtunes. 8. A gay god would (...) (25 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

541 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search