 | | Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | <388F65A5.9AD75FB2@voyager.net> <Foyr5w.Fo2@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) You yourself said it was an example intended to amuse at the start of the sub thread... I'm just playing along. (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Keeping Larry Amused —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | (...) No, I said it wasn't intended to be taken seriously. I was refering to my example only. But after thinking about it, I decided it may have legitimate repurcussions. My point really is that there can be a cost to a society by having an open (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Keeping Larry Amused —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | I decided to go back and see what the actual story here was, that is, what it was I actually said that started this thread. Every one has been making assumptions about it, even me. In a post which I otherwise heavily trimmed, Bruce said the (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]) —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | (...) For one, the electorate has to agree to go to libertopia in the first place. (...) Personal liability now includes not only things you might possibly be indirectly responsible for, which already is very insidious, but also things you are not (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
