 | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| <38850672.B6A753EE@eclipse.net> <FoK7Jv.LHr@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) One thing - at the point where a liability issue is at hand, the internal processes of the company become (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| (...) Granted. (...) Back up a sec. I never implied that liability shouldn't exist. The company would be liable for the bulk of any settlements, and any company that operated as you suggest above would get hit with lawsuits so often that it would (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
