Subject:
|
Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 19 Jan 2000 00:22:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2304 times
|
| |
|
|
<3884AEDA.9C6DA48F@eclipse.net> <FoJMsz.K0p@lugnet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Richard Franks wrote:
>
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
>
> > If, in addition to whatever
> > the company could be sued for, the president, CEO, board of directors,
> > and potentially stock holders could be held jointly and severally
> > liable, companies would never hurt people in ways that could come back
> > to haunt them.
>
> Does that responsibility follow them from job to job too? What about when
> they've retired? If the answer is 'no' to either of them, then I don't think
> that will work.
I think that if the answer is no, then it will still help, but not as
much. Or maybe cause a industry ceo cycle which wouldn't help us at all.
But, the answer (in my ideal) is yes! People regardless of
circumstances need to be generally responsible for their behavior.
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| (...) Using a country in the middle of ethnic cleansing as a comparison is hardly flattering. You can get shot in any country, but it's more likely to happen if you live in the US than say the UK. (...) I find it easy to believe, however I would (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
