 | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?] —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | <388320C1.F3E0E6D1@eclipse.net> <FoHr3F.Isu@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) In some ways that might be true. In others, and I think these are more important, corporations would be (...) (24 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?] —Richard Franks
|
| | | | | (...) Does that responsibility follow them from job to job too? What about when they've retired? If the answer is 'no' to either of them, then I don't think that will work. Richard (24 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?] —James Brown
|
| | | | (...) In the interests of not repeating myself: (URL) I don't think individuals have (in the general case) enough resources for personal liability to be feasable/sufficient. An example of this occured recently in Alberta - a number of people were (...) (24 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?] —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | (...) As another example, look at the people that AIDS from blood transfusions, while there were already good indications that HIV was transmitted through blood-contact ("it hasn't been proven yet that HIV causes AIDS!" (which is still true)), and (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
