 | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?] —Scott Edward Sanburn
| | | | Richard, (...) Well, I think money (Which is a form of trading) has been around since the beginning of mankind. If man has nothing to trade with, which is 100% tax, I don't think it would work. I would that would happen, but we will see. (...) Well, (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?] —Richard Franks
| | | | | | (...) IMO, shareholders and the purchacing power of a few knowledgable consumers isn't enough to control corperations. What are the evils that corperations *could* do, if they were allowed? * Education - biased or limited, creating clones to work in (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?] —John DiRienzo
| | | | | Scott E. Sanburn wrote in message <387E3BDD.6A5F8473@c...eb.net>... (...) I doubt thats it, but funny if it was. Lets spend a collossal amount of finite public resources on the Anti Nestle, Advertising-Tax Campaign (ANATC) (1). (...) I agree, I (...) (24 years ago, 14-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?] —Richard Franks
| | | | | (...) Oh - I thought everyone knew! Basically Nestle heavily promote their processed baby milk in third world countries. Parents there, wanting the best for their children *believe* the adverts - it comes from the West - it must be great right? As a (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
