Subject:
|
Re: Libertarian stuff
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 13 Jan 2000 19:45:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1621 times
|
| |
|
|
Dave,
Dave Schuler wrote:
>
> Scott:
>
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Edward Sanburn writes:
> > Dave,
> > Tell me if this is wrong, but this discussion seems to imply that our
> > current school system is completely neutral on things, which is not the
> > case, based on what I know.
>
> If that's what I implied, it was unintentional. Actually, your argument
> about a liberal-leaning school (or any -leaning school) supports my concerns
> about a Libertopian school system, simply changing the flavor of the -leaning!
>
> Dave!
Well, that is why I favor the school choice (Vouchers, etc.) I think we
should be able to have our children go to the school we deem best, not
what the government thinks. I think school choice will be a big topic in
the coming years. I think it is horrid that we let, especially poor
children, go to the gang ridden, crime filled monstrosities that plague
some parts of America, when parents of those children wish they could do
something better.
Scott S.
Is the Dave! kind of signifying you apart from regular Dave? Just
curious.
--
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Scott E. Sanburn-> ssanburn@cleanweb.net
Systems Administrator/CAD Operator-Affiliated Engineers ->
http://www.aeieng.com
LEGO Page -> http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Station/3372/legoindex.html
Home Page -> http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Station/3372/index.html
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Exclamation points
|
| Scott: (...) Why yes! It's Dave-factorial! Actually, I don't know why I started, but I've been signing my name that way for about 12 years. Just something weird I came up with during my crazy teen years. And, as you speculated, it's a way to (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Libertarian stuff
|
| (...) Liberama is disqualified because it relies on the assumption that in its great society people and corporations will be motivated by higher ethics and community responsibility--an assumption which is fine on paper but has never come close to (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
209 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
