Subject:
|
Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 12 Jan 2000 21:57:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1195 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Franks writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
>
> > "Whatever it takes" is certainly not hereditary or we wouldn't have so
> > many rags to riches stories (and the reverse)... Most of "whatever it
> > takes" is someone else caring.
>
> Agreed, studies of synaptic development favour the 'nurture' in nurture vs
> nature.
Just for clarity's sake, I wasn't referring to a genetic "whatever it
takes;" I was using a more metaphorical meaning of hereditary, like hereditary
royalty, or a generational history of child abuse.
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
209 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
