Debate : 3580


Off-Topic / Debate / 3580	3579 \| 3581

Subject:	Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Wed, 12 Jan 2000 19:00:03 GMT
Reply-To:	mattdm@mattdm.org/AntiSpam/
Viewed:	1243 times

Frank Filz <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote: > still do well. There will be organizations working with these children > (there are now). They will find most of the children who will benefit. > NO system can guarantee that NO ONE will fall through the cracks. I think a large part of what I'm reacting to is the concept that these will be profit-driven organizations, perhaps sponsored by large corporations looking for more skilled workers. That seems dangerous -- have you seen Disney's Pocahontas? -- Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
(...) I haven't seen Pocahontas. Why should the organizations necessarily be run by corporations? They aren't now. Even so, what is necessarily wrong with organizations run by buisiness? Buisiness is more accountable than the government (for (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
(...) But are those children any better off now? If a child has whatever it takes to succeed in school when the parents have no care, they ought to still do well. There will be organizations working with these children (there are now). They will (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

209 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search