To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3557
3556  |  3558
Subject: 
Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 12 Jan 2000 02:33:48 GMT
Viewed: 
1368 times
  
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 17:14:49 GMT, mattdm@mattdm.org (Matthew Miller)
wrote:

Yes, that's true. Cocaine was originally not realized to be harmful and
thought of as medicinal. When it became apparent that there might be some
health concerns, Coca-Cola removed it from their product.

Actually, they removed it from their product when there was a law
passed against cocaine. Or so I'd heard.

But this isn't necessarily a promise that all corporations will be so nice
in the future. Cigarette companies don't seem to be into removing nicotine
from their product. And Coca-Cola certainly still uses caffeine.

Nor do they even seem willing to admit that nicotine is addictive. I
mean, for crying out loud: "I, personally, do not believe nicotine is
addictive. I stand by that." "So why don't you smoke, mr CEO-man?"

Jasper



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
 
(...) Yes, that's true. Cocaine was originally not realized to be harmful and thought of as medicinal. When it became apparent that there might be some health concerns, Coca-Cola removed it from their product. But this isn't necessarily a promise (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

209 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR