Subject:
|
Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 11 Jan 2000 22:13:36 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
MATTDM@MATTDM.ORGspamless
|
Viewed:
|
2227 times
|
| |
|
|
Scott E. Sanburn <ssanburn@cleanweb.net> wrote:
> That's a good summation, if only I would prefer it to at least get to
> the community level. However, during the current administration, I don't
Surprisingly enough, I agree with you on this in many ways, although there
are some problems where I see a federal (or yes, even global) government as
unavoidable. And I think that those problems are ones that are increasing
more and more as we have a more globally-connected economy -- more and more
things are naturally becoming greater than local issues.
Question: if it's bad for governments to be huge and removed from the
people, doesn't the same thing apply to corporations? Wouldn't it be better
if they were also accountable at the community level?
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| [pardon the major snippage of Every Debate Known to Man ;) ] (...) I'm in agreement that it's flawed. I think where we differ is that I think it's better than nothing, whereas you believe that nothing would be better. Until it happens, the question (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
