 | | Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]) —Matthew Miller
|
| | | (...) I'm going to take a LOT of convincing on this one. I don't see _how_ Libertarianism is going to hold corporations accountable at all. In today's society, huge companies have very little accountability to me at all, and they'd have even less in (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]) —John DiRienzo
|
| | | | Matthew Miller wrote in message ... (...) convince (...) Simple, don't hold corporations accountable, but human beings. As it is now, corporations are running amuck, because the people who run them are able to hide. Take away their "immunity" and (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Swearing? {Was: Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])} —Richard Franks
|
| | | | | (...) And who said that debate was circlar? Richard (24 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]) —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) I'm not sure of the mechanism by which this works. All corporate meetings must be in public? No one is allowed walls on their offices? What is the enforcement mechanism? (...) It may do a "piss poor" job, but at least it's there to do (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
