Subject:
|
Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 11 Jan 2000 17:34:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1329 times
|
| |
|
|
"Scott E. Sanburn" wrote:
> Richard Franks wrote:
> >
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Matthew Miller writes:
> >
> > > It might not be an improvement, but it'll certainly be an issue. 'Cause
> > > without the government telling corporations they can't, a lot of food
> > > products could very easily have a new secret ingredient. Oh, sure, people
> > > might vote with their checkbooks and boycott crack-laced foods once it came
> > > to light -- but not if they've tried them once.
> >
> > And Coka Cola would finally win the tasteaddictionMORE challenge...
> >
> > Richard
>
> Didn't the original Coca-Cola have cocaine in it, for that extra midday
> boost (1), when it first came out?
With none of those embarassing white powder marks around the nostrils. ;) (This is similar
to the selling point of chewing tobacco, no smoke stains or smells.)
> 1) Original advertisement, which I saw, many moons ago!
Where did you find one of *those*? I've never seen one, except as a plate in a book.
best
LFB
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
209 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
