Debate : 3455


Off-Topic / Debate / 3455	3454 \| 3456

Subject:	Re: Libitarian guff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Sun, 9 Jan 2000 15:10:24 GMT
Viewed:	2217 times

<Fo1y8z.Mr9@lugnet.com> <38781DD3.4545ED6B@voyager.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Ah, so the charities are like a mini dollar-electable government? Wait. Wouldn't that make you status quo guys happy? Our government is a dollar-electable government. Chris

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Libitarian guff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
(...) Well, yes, but they're not our dollars at the moment. ;) The important part at the moment is that we strive for it not to be dollar-electable--I wonder what would happen if cash-motivation were allowed to come out into the open? Just a (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
(...) Fair enough, but I still disagree :) I would say that a worthy artist is one who produces worthy art. I would also suggest that the requirement of any form of suffering or willingness to suffer, on behalf of the artist, is an intellectual one (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search