Subject:
|
Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 8 Jan 2000 05:48:01 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
MATTDM@MATTDMsaynotospam.ORG
|
Viewed:
|
2426 times
|
| |
|
|
Frank Filz <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote:
> So just because your dad happened to build a house somewhere, you think the
> whole world should bow down and provide all the "niceties" of life,
> regarless of whether the location your dad built his house on was a sensible
> location?
It's a very sensible location. It's land that has been in the family for a
while and has unmeasurably high personal value. In fact, there are lots of
equally valuable connections to places and people in the surrounding
community, despite the "nonsensibility" of a slight majority of the
neighbors.
But like I said, there are many people with even deeper (moral, social,
financial, historical) attachments to their location than those my family
has. Are they just being "silly"?
> If they can build it for a cost which is worthwhile to them, they will
> build it. If it costs more than it is worth to them, then it's cost is more
> than it's worth to them. Perhaps
What if it costs more than they _have_?
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| Matthew Miller wrote in message ... (...) So just because your dad happened to build a house somewhere, you think the whole world should bow down and provide all the "niceties" of life, regarless of whether the location your dad built his house on (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
