Subject:
|
Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 Jan 2000 20:01:24 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@ANTISPAMmattdm.org
|
Viewed:
|
1641 times
|
| |
|
|
Dave Schuler <orrex@excite.com> wrote:
> Well, the easiest criticism against this is that circumstances have arisen
> in the subsequent centuries which could simply not have been foreseen by the
> founders and which their document could therefore not reasonably be expected
> to address. Which is to say that basing our current actions and views on the
> opinions generated 200 years ago by the circumstances of 200 years ago is
> risky at best and frankly anachronistic.
The amazing thing is that they were foresighted enough to understand this,
and left the constitution as a relatively small framework, and even gave the
ability to modify that.
The government we have today, for better or worse, is a result of 200+ years
of interaction and development. That's a lot due to the design of the people
who made it, and their realization that they couldn't predict everything.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
188 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
