Subject:
|
Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 Jan 2000 18:49:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2252 times
|
| |
|
|
One thing I'd like to toss in here is the possibility that it is ok for
local government to spend money on social programs (including art and
schools). This is subject to the limitation that state and national
governments don't control the local governments spending on such, only
the people do, and that there is sufficient "competition" amongst local
governments that you can chose your government. At this point, the local
government is really no different than a neighborhood association.
Groups of people may form associations any way they like, and have any
governing method they care for.
--
Frank Filz
-----------------------------
Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com (business only please)
Home: mailto:ffilz@mindspring.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| (...) I think this is a pointless argument, simply because a national defense was FOUNDED in the Constitution. The NEA was not. Artists have somehow survived since the beginning of time, and somehow, we seem to be in a notion that the federal (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
