To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3288
3287  |  3289
Subject: 
Re: Swearing?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 6 Jan 2000 16:22:24 GMT
Viewed: 
3816 times
  
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 01:18:16 GMT, "craig hamilton"
<craigo-lego@webtv.net> wrote:

>  there are nude chidren in brian froud's work. ( the stunning "fairies",
> "lady cottington's pressed fairie book", good fairies; bad fairies", etc.)
> anyone who would consider these paintings child pornography is themselves
> morally decayed.  julia margret cammeron was one of the earliest art
> photographers (victorian). her subject?  nude children in sometimes
> evocative poses.
> 
>  chid pornography and art have _absolutely_ nothing to do with each other!
> jean bennet ramsey is an example of child pornography.  being paraded across
> a stage fully dressed as a 18-year old hooker... well, it sure ain't art!
> 
>  beauty is in the eye of the beholder. so is perversion.

Just for the record, I fully agree.

Jasper



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Swearing?
 
(...) there are nude chidren in brian froud's work. ( the stunning "fairies", "lady cottington's pressed fairie book", good fairies; bad fairies", etc.) anyone who would consider these paintings child pornography is themselves morally decayed. julia (...) (27 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR