Subject:
|
Re: Swearing?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 Jan 2000 05:07:35 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
johnneal@uswest.(Spamless)net
|
Viewed:
|
3525 times
|
| |
|
|
Jasper Janssen wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jan 2000 17:25:13 GMT, "Dave Schuler" <orrex@excite.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Boy-oh-boy! I can't tell you how delighted I am to read that! I am _sick to
> > death_ of that Postmodernist "all is art" nonsense! Such a definition seems
> > to imply that anything requiring or allowing interpretation is art, and is by
> > extension roughly equivalent to saying that nothing is art.
>
> Yup. There is no useful definition of art.
Why??? This statement seems more lazy than profound. Try.
-John
> "All is art" or "none is
> art" are no less useful than any others you care to offer.
>
> Jasper
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Swearing?
|
| (...) Yup. There is no useful definition of art. "All is art" or "none is art" are no less useful than any others you care to offer. Jasper (27 years ago, 5-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
