Subject:
|
Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 Jan 2000 04:21:49 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
{mattdm@mattdm}Spamless{.org}
|
Viewed:
|
1790 times
|
| |
|
|
Scott E. Sanburn <ssanburn@cleanweb.net> wrote:
> The US Constitution and Bill of Rights, coined by the founding fathers,
> all rights are God given.
This sentence doesn't seem to make any sense to me. Can you rephrase/explain
what you're saying?
> As in the "rights" of health care, etc., in theory, all are good ideas, in
> utopia. In reality, there is a difference. What does the market do? Who
> will pay for it? Is it in the nations best interest. Who will enforce it?
> Will we lose national sovereignty, etc.
Ok. So if they're good ideas in a perfect world, is there a problem with
saying that those are things we want to strive for as a
society/cuture/nation/people?
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
188 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
