To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3245
3244  |  3246
Subject: 
Re: Swearing?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 6 Jan 2000 00:06:41 GMT
Viewed: 
1878 times
  
On Wed, 5 Jan 2000 04:02:51 GMT, mattdm@mattdm.org (Matthew Miller)
wrote:
like to assign to it. (People even say this sarcastically: "Oh, that doesn't
have to be pretty/funny/meaningful -- it's Art". That doesn't mean this is
necessarily good, but it's what the word means.)

ITYM "It's Modern Art".

Jasper



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Swearing?
 
(...) I think that what you're doing is creating a restricted redefinition of what art is. Historically, art has had a much broader meaning than the one you'd like to assign to it. (People even say this sarcastically: "Oh, that doesn't have to be (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR