To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3194
3193  |  3195
Subject: 
Re: Swearing?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 4 Jan 2000 15:58:04 GMT
Reply-To: 
johnneal@uswest.net&stopspam&
Viewed: 
1563 times
  
Christopher Lannan wrote:

Whoo hoo! One fo my very favorite debates has reared up again! And it's only
been a week or so!

You really can't tell people not to be "obscene", "vulgar" "profane" or
"indecent" and expect them to follow those instructions exactly unless they
have been very well coached to know what is "obscene", "vulgar", "profane", and
"indecent" to you. Everyday in the news there is an art exhibit that a great
many people feel is all of the above. A crucifix submerged in a jar of urine
or a Madonna with feces for nipples come to mind.

Ah, one of my favorite debate topics - what is art, or more specifically, where is
the line between pornography and art?  Your examples of "art" IMHO aren't really
art, but are (very intentionally) vulgar, obscene attempts to offend particular
groups.  The artists who create such things are weak-minded non-Christians who are
too lazy or dim to come up with anything profound.  Their work says more about
their own ineptitude than their subject matter.

<Donning flame suit and beaming to .debate> John








Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Swearing?
 
(...) Yikes! Well, I won't flame you because I expect that neither of us is qualified to define "art." However, you've mounted some ad hominem attacks against prospective artists, and, in the end, these can weaken your own credibility and do nothing (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Swearing?
 
(...) Whoo hoo! One fo my very favorite debates has reared up again! And it's only been a week or so! You really can't tell people not to be "obscene", "vulgar" "profane" or "indecent" and expect them to follow those instructions exactly unless they (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)

473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR