To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3150
3149  |  3151
Subject: 
Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sun, 2 Jan 2000 07:35:06 GMT
Viewed: 
1514 times
  
John DiRienzo wrote:

Jasper Janssen wrote in message <387ab92e.833168838@lugnet.com>...
On Fri, 31 Dec 1999 07:03:32 GMT, John Neal <johnneal@uswest.net>
wrote:

I like a more objective definition because I hate the trend towards • relativism I
think we are experiencing these days.  If a sociopath considers killing • others
good, is it?  But if good is objective, from who's perspective?  God, who • is by
definition, perfect, and therefore the perfect judge of good and evil. • Discerning
God's perspective of good is another question, but at least the search for • good
extends beyond our mortal and imperfect selves.

Good isn't objective. What we, society as a whole, consider to be
"good" is both up for debate in certain areas (I'm specifically _not_
going to mention ab*rti*n here), and it is no more valid than the
ideas of other societies, other than possibly by virtue of having
survived longer (and objective moralists aren't generally too keen on
defining objective good in terms of Darwinism - are you?).

   I think you are just plain wrong.  Some societies flourish while others
perish because they have a better grasp of the true nature of good (which I
hold is best viewed objectively).  I will leave Darwin out of it.

Until we have a planetary wide homogeneous society, Good Societies will ALMOST
NEVER flourish longterm over bad, as history has proven.  They may last a while,
but sooner or later a "bad" society (more warlike) stomps on them.


--
| Tom Stangl, Technical Support          Netscape Communications Corp
|      Please do not associate my personal views with my employer



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
 
Jasper Janssen wrote in message <387ab92e.833168838@...et.com>... (...) relativism I (...) others (...) is by (...) Discerning (...) good (...) I think you are just plain wrong. Some societies flourish while others perish because they have a better (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

188 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR