 | | Welcome to the Naughties (was Re: Welcome to the Ohs —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | I prefer the "naughts" or "naughties" to the "Ohs". On the whole topic, I found it interesting that last century, public opinion was pretty solid on the start being 1901 (the Grand Rapids MI Press published an excerpt from the Jan 1 1900 and Jan 1 (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Welcome to the Naughties (was Re: Welcome to the Ohs —Rick Kujawa
|
| | | | | Would it technically be the naughtSies, naught plural, (sounds too tyranical). How about "the autsies" (like double aut 00) (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Welcome to the Auties (was Re: Welcome to the Naughties (was Re: Welcome to the Ohs)) —Rick Kujawa
|
| | | | | | (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Welcome to the Naughties (was Re: Welcome to the Ohs —John DiRienzo
|
| | | | I did glean enough from the old timers to know that last time around they were called the aughts. -- Have fun! John The Legos you've been dreaming of... (URL) weird Lego site: (URL) is yet another tool in the dumbing-down of America by a power (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Welcome to the Aughtsies was Naughties (was Re: Welcome to the Ohs —Rick Kujawa
|
| | | | (...) So I guess they will be called the aughtsies. (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
