 | | Re: We Should've Listened to Dick Cheney —Ross Crawford
|
| | | (...) So you'd consider ANY body count "acceptable" in order to "win" this military action? And do you think the average Iraqi would have the same answer to that question as you do? ROSCO (17 years ago, 17-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: We Should've Listened to Dick Cheney —Richie Dulin
|
| | | | | (...) Averages are seldom a good measure of populations. Mind you, as the declining population approaches 1, they get a lot better. Cheers Richie Dulin (17 years ago, 17-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: We Should've Listened to Dick Cheney —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Not one death is "acceptable" (YOUR word, not mine). (...) Yes. What I mean is: if 10 innocents are killed today, and 12 tomorrow, then that doesn't mean we are suddenly "losing". And if there are only 2 the following day, we are not suddenly (...) (17 years ago, 17-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: We Should've Listened to Dick Cheney —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | (...) Do you have a cite for that? ROSCO (17 years ago, 17-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: We Should've Listened to Dick Cheney —Richie Dulin
|
| | | | (...) Ah! I get it: Not that numbers mean anything. Cheers Richie Dulin (17 years ago, 17-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
