 | | Re: A new community of mischeif and mayhem
|
|
(...) Because I don't know how to post and cross-post properly... (17 years ago, 23-Jul-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: A new community of mischeif and mayhem
|
|
(...) Woohoo! Sounds like a great place! (...) Yes, that seems to cover all the themes which are popular in the community. (...) Sounds like a bargain! (...) Cheers Richie Dulin Stajinaria Member #2 (Not sure why FUT is set to .o-t.d....) (17 years ago, 23-Jul-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | A new community of mischeif and mayhem
|
|
You know how when you go to look at the list of rules for a community forum, and the last one is something dumb like "The most important rule is to have fun"? Man, that irks me. Nobody has to tell me to have fun, it sorta comes naturally to me. And (...) (17 years ago, 22-Jul-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.announce, lugnet.people.adults) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Brickshelf?
|
|
Brickshelf is back up, with a warning date of the end of the month. Now's your chance, GO! (17 years ago, 16-Jul-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Brickshelf?
|
|
(...) A bit off-topic here, but I'd hardly call Flickr a "bigbox". From their earliest days they have been a community oriented company in a way that nearly every other company around can learn from. They built a fantastic tool always keeping in (...) (17 years ago, 16-Jul-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | BrickShelf and the bust.
|
|
Hello! I was just roaming the recent galleries on BrickShelf. Embedded inbetween the Lego folders was this advertisement: (URL) made me smirk. I remember a picture that concentrated on a female bust covered by a Lego t-shirt once caused uproar and (...) (17 years ago, 11-Jul-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
Big thanks to the defunct pseudo admins ! were you able to save my :BP: or :RA: ? Steve (17 years ago, 2-Jul-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
(...) :whistlesinnocently: (URL) Stajinaria Forum - A New Hope> :-) (URL) (17 years ago, 29-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
Darn and bugger... Just as I was coming back after a short break. *sigh* and thanks to Ross and Janey you two can have my babies you were so awesome. (17 years ago, 29-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
(...) Ah,because you my friend know the sad state of affairs. (17 years ago, 28-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
(...) Janey-- If I had known of JLUG, I'd have been there. Sorry to have missed all the fun, but best of all new endeavors to you. It sounds like it would have been fun. Especially the robotic cat thing. Play Well and Prosper, Matthew "The Brick (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
(...) Says you. Ley (17 years ago, 25-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
(...) Surely you could have summed up all of the above with "Bonk"... ;-) Peace and precis, Professor Whateverly (URL) (17 years ago, 25-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
(...) Surely you could have summed up all of the above with "Bonk"... ;-) Peace and precis, Professor Whateverly (URL) (17 years ago, 25-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
Alas, how will I continue my 'debate' with Lar? Thanks Janey and Ross for all your efforts. I shall now doubly cherish my engraved brick. Peace and passing, Professor Whateverly (URL) (17 years ago, 25-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Santa Fe B-Unit: OK or not?
|
|
(...) On closer inspection it would appear that copyright law is a bit more complex in what it covers than I realised (second paragraph of (URL) suspect that Lego may differ from needlepoint because of this in that it is (most probably) counted as a (...) (17 years ago, 25-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Santa Fe B-Unit: OK or not?
|
|
(...) not exactly. The printing of the design can be copyright, however what you do with building it is not. I am more familiar with the needlework part of this for an example. You cannot copy the instructions, however you can stitch as many designs (...) (17 years ago, 25-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Santa Fe B-Unit: OK or not?
|
|
(...) It's good to hear they will act. Does this mean you create needlepoint and collect Lego? Interesting combination of hobbies. (...) Copyright law is complex. Ownership of copyright is usually very easy (at least when it's not part of a (...) (17 years ago, 24-Jun-07, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
(...) Janey "Red Brick" Why the heck you did that?.. Just heard the news from Gambort and shocked. Man, I was trying to connect to The Place every other day, still living in hope to see the day my connection problems are solved. Now I know this will (...) (17 years ago, 23-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
(...) :-( (17 years ago, 21-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
