 | | Re: peeron inventory —Timothy Gould
|
| | | (...) --snip-- (...) John, It was not polite to make the comment "Corrections sent to inv@peeron again are not getting posted. It has been a bit since they did a few.". The reason it isn't polite is because it is a) unneccesary and b) expectant as (...) (18 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: peeron inventory —John Patterson
|
| | | | (...) I differ with you here. Serious collectors need to know. You have no idea how many are wrong. This is not impolite. It is a systemic problem. Would you feel that it is more polite just to note it on Lugnet? If that is a solution I can do it. I (...) (18 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: peeron inventory —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | --snip-- (...) Hi John, Thanks for taking that on board. Noone is saying your contribution isn't worthwhile and I don't think anyone minds your regular updates of what you've done. If you stick to these I think we will all be happier. It also means (...) (18 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
