 | | Re: Two questions for the Conservatives and/or Republicans out there —David Eaton
|
| | | (...) Of course you're not guaranteed, but you could do some 50/50 chance stuff. Imagine if one candidate is ahead in the polls with 75% of the vote (Sven), compared to another candidate with 25% (Twiggy). It could be argued that Twiggy has no (...) (18 years ago, 9-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Two questions for the Conservatives and/or Republicans out there —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Yeah, there's gotta be a way. Or, maybe the code is owned by the government and Diebold merely provides the hardware? I'm no expert in this area, but it seems to me that electronic voting shouldn't be such a huge issue. JOHN (18 years ago, 9-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Two questions for the Conservatives and/or Republicans out there —Jason S. Mantor
|
| | | | (...) The current administration effectively owns the code now, and they're not going to let anyone see it. Open source is the only acceptable solution in this application. (18 years ago, 11-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Two questions for the Conservatives and/or Republicans out there —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Are you implying that there isn't any oversight by any Democrat? (...) That could very well be; the concerns to me would be the ones outlined by DaveE. JOHN (18 years ago, 11-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
