To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 2781
2780  |  2782
Subject: 
Re: Pastel = Profit (Was Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?))
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 10 Dec 1999 15:31:23 GMT
Viewed: 
1908 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
[...] I am a verbose advocate of property rights so I feel committed to
upholding that ideal.
[...]
Does that cover it?  If not, feel free to ask again or point out holes.
This helps me to formalize my opinions.

I'm curious:  Do you consider intellectual property rights to be a subset
of property rights, or something totally separate?  The original issue, I
think, was at least partially about intellectual property rights.

--Todd



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Pastel = Profit (Was Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?))
 
(...) Hi Frank, Actually, the reasoning for why your property is safe while I'm in your apartment falls under both my contract and aesthetics categories. When I refer to contracts in a broad sense I don't just mean reams of legalese with hundreds of (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

116 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR