Subject:
|
Re: Pastel = Profit (Was Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?))
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 10 Dec 1999 14:13:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1722 times
|
| |
|
|
Christopher Weeks wrote:
> Is the idea behind being on the yes side a moral one about property
> rights or is it based on cultivating a relationship with TLC? If it's a
> moral one, then I guess we just disagree because the only things like
> morals that I have are based on contracts (in a broad sense) to which I
> have agreed, and personal aesthetics (which people sometimes
> over-emotionally call honor).
I want to understand your point here better. The above reads to me that
you only respect property rights when you have willingly entered into a
contract with someone. Is this really true? Do I need to sign a contract
with you before I let you into my apartment lest you decide that you
want all my LEGO sets?
Please clarify.
--
Frank Filz
-----------------------------
Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com (business only please)
Home: mailto:ffilz@mindspring.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
116 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
