To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 27601
27600  |  27602
Subject: 
Re: Danish cartoons outrage some Moslem groups and nations
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 9 Feb 2006 16:36:13 GMT
Viewed: 
1780 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:
  
Sure Pat “I was for Ariel’s stroke because he divided the Holy Land until I was against Ariel’s stroke ‘cause I couldn’t have my Theme Park” Robertson has his followers, and has called for assassinations, and other such crap.

   However, his followers wouldn’t amount to many thousands of people storming the streets. There were 200,000+ muslims in one protest wit hthe burning flags and calling for the heads of cartoonists.

Did he actually call for the assassination? If he did, what’s up with those no-good followers of his who aren’t following orders? Talk is cheap. Protected, in fact.

   I don’t think Robertson could muster 20 people to go “storming the gates” to kill people. And if he did, I, along with millions of Christians around the world, would flat out no holds barred, denounce him and his zealots unequivocably as non-Christians.

AAhmen and Ahmen. Well spoken, Bruce!

   Therein lies the difference that I think John is trying to get across. If and when Christians find something offensive, a really brain damaged jackass may go to extremes. When Muslims find somehting offensive, there’ll be 200,000+ jackasses in one city calling for the heads of the “infidels”.

I’m not saying that Christians are all good and Muslims are all bad. I’m saying that one religion, over the whole, preaches peace and one religion, on the whole, preaches death and destruction to the infidels.

If the tables were turned, and the same number of Christians were doing what the Muslims have done, there had better be every single other Christian out there protesting what the others were doing, or I leave the “church” and join the others in protesting/stopping them. I realize that there has been some objections by a few Muslims groups, but not nearly enough.

I am afraid Dave is correct; if it walks the walk of violence, and talks the talk of violence, it is violence, no matter how unPC that conclusion is. The only way to rectify that is internally.

   It’s not black and white, to be sure, but there is a difference. One should not dismiss that difference between the religions as inconsequential nad lump both of them together.


  
   Now, before you start pointing to specific instances of hate crimes perpetrated by so-called Christians, please realize that that behavior is universally condemned by any sort of mainstream Christian.

Their condemnation doesn’t really matter, since we’re discussing the fundamentalists (or absolutists), rather than the sane moderates.


And finding sane moderates in a Christian environment is a litle easier than finding a sane moderate in a Muslim environment.


  
   The Christian Right has the right to scream any hateful idea they want, as do the Islamofascists. And one could argue that they both do. But what they do with that intolerance are completely 2 different things.

Of course they have the right to express their views, though they cross the line when they preach politics from the pulpit or when they threaten those who disagree with their views.


Perfectly agree--and having congregations told who they must vote for by the padre is ludicrous.

But who’s the more foolish--the fool or the fool who follows him? If the congregation wants to be brow beaten, then they’re sheep. Hey, not my life style--I prefer to think for myself.

Yes, and we can’t legislate stupidity (infortunately;-) Which segues into Progressivism, but I digress...
  
  
   So that blogger, while cute and clever in his prose, is, in the final analysis, plainly wrong. Let us just imagine how absolutely and completely unglued the Islamofascists would become if anyone dare create a “Piss MoHo” work of art! And then we can compare that reaction to “Piss Christ” or any of the literally 1,000s of offensive works of art aimed squarely at Christianity and see if they are really the same. My money says, “Hell, no!”

Let’s imagine a President Pat Robertson, for a moment, who had dubiously secured for himself the role of Commander In Chief during a time of permanent war, and in so doing alleged himself to have the absolute power to do whatever he wants (you know, just like what Dubya has done). Do you really think that Robertson--out of the mainstream or not--wouldn’t exert his crazy fundamentalist will over the citizenry? How long do you think it would be before atheism, or even non-evangelical Christianity, were declared a blasphemous crime against the theocracy? My money says “a day or two at most.”


And if the 300+ million people put up with it, who’s the actual idiot?

   The Robertson example is extreme, I grant, but no more extreme that Robertson himself.

Long, long ago I commented here in OT.debate that people, while not necessarily evil, will nonetheless “expand” to fill the space available to them, behavior-wise. If passionate Christian fundamentalists had free rein to act as they pleased, I have no basis to conclude that they would not speedily and happily usher in a new dark age of intolerance and inquisition.

(not that anyone expects an Inqusition...)

Dave!

And I would disagree with that notion--the Christians that I know are peace-first types. One has to look no further than the LSK funeral to see that Christians, at least the true believers of God’s word, are like this.

“True believers of God’s word”-- careful Dave, that can be very easily misconstrued. I would word it thusly: “faithful followers of Christ’s Gospel of radical love”. Not as pithy, but more explicit and less likely to be confused with some other whacked-out group of “true believers”.

JOHN



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Danish cartoons outrage some Moslem groups and nations
 
(...) Well, let's see. If I go on-air to millions and declare that a certain US President should be assassinated, will Conservatives rally around me to protect my right to free speech? Of course, if I were a dessicated, talentless hack who called (...) (19 years ago, 9-Feb-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Danish cartoons outrage some Moslem groups and nations
 
(...) Sure Pat "I was for Ariel's stroke because he divided the Holy Land until I was against Ariel's stroke 'cause I couldn't have my Theme Park" Robertson has his followers, and has called for assassinations, and other such crap. However, his (...) (19 years ago, 9-Feb-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

109 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR