 | | Re: Excellent news! —John Neal
| | | | (...) I reject your equivocation. In one case, the victim is an innocent, and in the other the "victim" is a coldblooded murderer. Being rendered "harmless" does in no way make a person "blameless". (...) No system is perfect. To criticize otherwise (...) (18 years ago, 4-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Excellent news! —Timothy Gould
| | | | | | --SNIP-- (...) Preserving the sanctity of life by State-sanctioned killing. Interesting argument there. Tim (18 years ago, 4-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Excellent news! —Dave Schuler
| | | | | (...) I see that you are rebutting my "equivocation" with a straw man. Nowhere do I claim that the murderer is blameless, but I don't equate his "blamefulness" (sorry about that malapropism) with some "right" to execute him. And the person (or (...) (18 years ago, 4-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | |
