Subject:
|
Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 7 Dec 1999 21:04:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
841 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, James Brown writes:
> Yes, you are correct. There are people out there who feel that their desire
> to see a picture *right now* overrides the Lego Company's right to control
> images they own. There are also people out there who don't see it as an
> issue.
I don't know if I see it as an issue. I was off the net all weekend, and
looking on Monday AM I was mostly thinking "darn it- I missed them." I wonder
how many of the people that were for taking the pictures down looked at them?
Did anyone honestly say to themselves- "These should not be published on
the 'net, so I'm not going to look at them"?
I guess I just don't know if publishing information that a company doesn't
want us to see is "wrong" (don't reporters do this all the time?) though I
will agree that it could be considered hostile to that companies interests,
and if we as AFOLs are trying to create a better relationship with tLC then
maybe not a good idea.
taking the reporter idea farther- it seems that it is tLC's job to keep their
secrets secret and it is the reporter's job not to- both sides have their part
to play in this "game."
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
116 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
