 | | The case for compensation —Scott Arthur
|
| | | (URL) Given that, at Washington's behest, Iraq had to pay war reparations after it invaded Iraq, why should Washington not compensate Vietnam’s Agent Orange victims? Scott A (20 years ago, 2-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The case for compensation —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) Clearly you're not aware of the facts. The US companies that manufactured the Patriotic Defoliant "Agent Orange" can't be held responsible because they were only obeying the orders of the Commander In Chief during a time of Just and Righteous (...) (20 years ago, 2-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The case for compensation —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) Hmm. In that case, perhaps they could have called it "Agent Red White and Blue" rather than the rather un-Patriotic (spit) Agent Orange. (...) I’m inspired by your cowboy president… I love shooting from the hip. ;) Scott A (20 years ago, 2-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: The case for compensation —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) Wow! They invaded their own country???? Good way to get that WMD funding approved I guess... ROSCO (20 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The case for compensation —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) Well SH did say Q8 was part of Iraq. ;) Scott A (20 years ago, 5-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
