Subject:
|
The case for compensation
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 2 May 2005 09:44:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1086 times
|
| |
|
|
Given that, at Washington’s behest, Iraq had to pay war reparations after it
invaded Iraq, why should Washington not compensate Vietnam’s Agent Orange
victims?
Scott A
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: The case for compensation
|
| (...) Clearly you're not aware of the facts. The US companies that manufactured the Patriotic Defoliant "Agent Orange" can't be held responsible because they were only obeying the orders of the Commander In Chief during a time of Just and Righteous (...) (20 years ago, 2-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
