 | | Re: Activist Lawmaker Legislating From The Barner Shop (Thread Hijack)) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | I liked this story: (URL) Why underpants must stay under in the state of Virginia> Scott A (20 years ago, 10-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Activist Lawmaker Legislating From The Barner Shop (Thread Hijack)) —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) He found that exposed undergarments were 'offensive'??? K... well then... Maybe if a guy's undergarments were exposed... no need for that! But the thong/lowrider jeans combination? I've seen that and sometimes it's quite opposite of (...) (20 years ago, 10-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Activist Lawmaker Legislating From The Barber Shop (Thread Hijack)) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | Does Canada not have some sort of register for self-confessed dirty old men? ;) Scott A (...) (20 years ago, 11-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Activist Lawmaker Legislating From The Barber Shop (Thread Hijack)) —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) <snip> Depends on the level of 'dirtiness'--maybe I'll go check myself in at the nearest rehab centre... It's free, y'know--my socialist country pays for such things... (20 years ago, 11-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
