|
|
 | | the Law of Unitended Consequences strikes again
|
| (URL) course, some (who favored this act) might say that if you want protection from your abusive boyfriend that you're living with, too bad. You should be married if you want protection! (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Really?
|
| (URL) George Bush: the United States will not ignore your oppression, or excuse your oppressors. When you stand for your liberty, we will stand with you. Scott A (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Where is the justice?
|
| (...) (Did I mention the UN?) Did Bush not prove last week that the UN disarmed Iraq? (...) Do you mean Afghanistan; the country which is now ruled by warlords? (...) Do you mean Iraq; the country which is now ruled by err... NOBODY? Why no mention (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Civil War!
|
| In lugnet.color, Richard Noeckel wrote: [snip - just go back and read it] Alright! At last, some clear sense in this morasse! My legions of Bionicle mutant toa heroes stand ready for battle! They are through with being put down. Their patience is (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Civil War!
|
| (...) I wonder if we should all put away our toys (or dump them off at the local children's hospital, donate to the tsunami children) and go outside for a bicycle ride, or grab a book or something. -Patrick (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
