 | | Two Questions and a Comment (was Re: A Community Problem) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | (...) I'd like to mention that legitimate competitors such as BTR and MegaBloks do not engage in the illegal duplication of TLC's protected intellectual property, so these two companies (at least) should be considered separate from those less (...) (19 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Two Questions and a Comment (was Re: A Community Problem) —David Koudys
|
| | | | | (...) I was referring to the direct kock-offs of TLC sets, and I apologize for inadvertently lumping all 'building brick' competitors into the same mold. (...) The issue for me is that they may have to take, or already have taken, this course of (...) (19 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Two Questions and a Comment (was Re: A Community Problem) —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) That's generally accurate, although IIRC there have been lawsuits eating up time and money from both TLC and MB. And I expect this is primarily "Comapny X" against Lego, like the Lego against the China knock-off, or Lego against Best-Lock. I (...) (19 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Two Questions and a Comment (was Re: A Community Problem) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) I thought we already HAD an AFOL who was a lawyer... but he quit and went on to be a LLCA model builder. :-) (19 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Two Questions and a Comment (was Re: A Community Problem) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) That's true. Of course, the LEGO v MegaBloks suits are somewhat different from LEGO v Shifty/Brick, since LEGO's beef with MegaBloks involves the specific design of the studs-n-tubes interlocking system and the "look" of the 2x4 brick, whereas (...) (19 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
