To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 2652
2651  |  2653
Subject: 
Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 6 Dec 1999 07:55:49 GMT
Viewed: 
1365 times
  
In lugnet.general, lehman@javanet.com (Todd Lehman) writes:
No, if I were actually trying to "bully" someone into doing or not something
(not that I would), I don't think I'd waste my time making statements that
could be interpreted one way or the other (i.e., an opinion); I'd make
things 100% clear.  But I'd have to think I had some serious basis on which
to stand first.  Since there was little basis here other than well-
intentioned opinion (in my case), that's what it was and nothing more.  In
Suzanne's case, she knows more than I do, so she has her own reasons.

Whoops, that's not to say that her reasons weren't well-intentioned.  I just
meant she had other reasons (legal, etc.) beyond that due to extensive
knowledge, etc.

--Todd



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
 
(...) Kinda exactly like that, yeah.[1] (...) Yikes. Wow. Well, I'm going to have to tone down my opinions then, if it came across that way. More disclaimers needed, or something. Persuade through logical argument, yes. Bully, no. (I'm speaking for (...) (25 years ago, 6-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

105 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR