To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 2631
2630  |  2632
Subject: 
Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 3 Dec 1999 05:09:12 GMT
Viewed: 
1768 times
  
Richard Franks <spontificus@__nospam__yahoo.com> wrote:
My view is that if you can share a Lego deal equally between X people who want
it - great. If someone buys lots and lots then less of those other people will
be happy. (1)

Your view is that you *want* it more because you have more money. That money
comes from ability and working hard. Therefore anyone with ability who works
hard to make opportunities for themselves, will make the enough money to want
it as much as you do. (2)

My view is that we live in a society where not everyone works with computers
and makes silly amounts of money(3) - we have nurses, bus-drivers,
road-workers, teachers, receptionists, quality-controllers at tooth-pick
factories (4).

Most of these people will have ability and will work hard and will perform
services vital to the community, but don't get paid as much. In *real*
emotional terms they may want a Lego set as much as anyone else, but are
somehow less deserving?

You know, while my basic response to this would be, "yeah, I know,
some people, through no fault of their own and through no lack of
hard work, will simply never make a fraction of the money Larry
makes, but that's just reality, we deal with it," I do find what
you're saying to be fairly interesting, and not at all like what
I've come to expect from our wonderful "milk the lucky rich guy till
he's dry to pay for the needs of anybody who has less than him"
socialist friends here.

So yeah, speaking in a strictly feel-good kind of warm-fuzzy way, I
almost agree with you.  A person who makes 1/50th of what another
person makes may just want some limited item just as much, may
"deserve" it just as much.

But in my cynical "the world sucks and most people do too so we just
gotta make the best of it" way, I know that it doesn't really matter
if the low-paid person wants the high-priced toy as much as the
high-paid person.  The high-paid person usually gets it.

Really, though, does it matter?  It's just stuff.


--
The parts you want and nothing else?
http://jaba.dtrh.com/ - Just Another Brick Auction
Why pay eBay? Run your own LEGO auctions for free!
http://www.guarded-inn.com/bricks/



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc)
 
(...) Thankyou for *considering* my points - sometimes it seems like an all too rare thing on usenet forums! (...) I'm trying to resist the pull of cynicism myself, I don't know how well I succeed sometimes! (...) Very true - if you can't be happy (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc)
 
(...) Bah, you've got the bigger sigh, you win. No more sighing for me then. *sulk* I was responding mostly to: (...) Which I read as you saying that I said it was wrong/bad whatever, but I've confused myself now, and it's probably not that (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

163 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR