 | | Re: Is religion dead in the water? —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | (...) You summed up what I would have responded with very succinctly, Orion. I agree with you assessment of atheists, and proper definition of agnostics. -->Bruce<-- (20 years ago, 16-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Definitions vs. Daffynitions (was Re: Is religion dead in the water? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I do too. It might make sense to keep it bookmarked! (20 years ago, 16-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Definitions vs. Daffynitions (was Re: Is religion dead in the water? —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) And, of course, I had to look further into it and find all the variations on a theme just to argue against myself (see immediately preceeding post on scroll). -->B<-- (20 years ago, 16-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Definitions vs. Daffynitions (was Re: Is religion dead in the water? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Saw that, well done. Advantage of arguing against yourself... You always win. Disadvantage of arguing against yourself... You always lose, too. (20 years ago, 16-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Definitions vs. Daffynitions (was Re: Is religion dead in the water? —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) It depends on what you are trying to accomplish. If you want people to vote for you in an election, you don't want to undercut yourself. If you are merely looking for enlightenment and better understanding then it is best to test yourself a (...) (20 years ago, 16-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
