 | | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water? —Dave Schuler
| | | | (...) I guess my posts could sometimes be declammed when I've cited too many shellfish. Dave! (20 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water? —Bruce Schlickbernd
| | | | | (...) Clams got legs! Unfortunately, your disclaimed/declaimed/declammed non-sequitor doesn't. Unless I reply like a fool, in which case....oh no.... -->Bruce<-- clamming up... (20 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water? —Dave Schuler
| | | | | (...) Looks like mollusc has run out. Actually, when I first read your post, I saw "declaimed" as "declammed," so the non-sequitur was borne of a misreading of your sequitur. Dave! (20 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water? —Bruce Schlickbernd
| | | | | (...) I figured as much, which is why I juxtaposed the three of them together so the full irony would be apparent. Of course, if ya gotta explain a joke.... -->Bruce<-- (20 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water? —Dave Schuler
| | | | | (...) Doh! Next time, try juxtaposing the three of them apart. Maybe I'll get it, then. Dave! (20 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | |
