Subject:
|
Re: Can it really be true?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 5 Oct 2004 13:40:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1172 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
Rumsfeld questions
Saddam-Bin Laden link: “To my knowledge, I have not seen any strong, hard
evidence that links the two”.
Can it really be true? Next he’ll be saying that Saddam posed no threat and
that 1,000’s have died to establish a huge breeding ground for terrorists.
|
Typical European over-simplification of a complex issue. Sure, the “breeding
ground” is one benefit, but you’re forgetting the huge oil and reconstruction
contracts. Cheney has to secure his yearly, non-conflict-of-interest salary,
after all.
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Can it really be true?
|
| (URL) Rumsfeld questions Saddam-Bin Laden link>: "To my knowledge, I have not seen any strong, hard evidence that links the two". Can it really be true? Next he'll be saying that Saddam posed no threat and that 1,000's have died to establish a huge (...) (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
