 | | Virgin Galactic (was Re: Some good news for a change, maybe? —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote: (stuff about SpaceShipOne) Making the rounds of the newswires today: (URL) Branson and his firm, Virgin, are to launch a new space tourism venture, in partnership with Paul Allen and Burt Rutan, (...) (20 years ago, 27-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Virgin Galactic (was Re: Some good news for a change, maybe? —Scott Arthur
| | | | | | Be careful, Richard Branson's life is one big publicity stunt. Where Branson is concerned, not everything which glistens is shiny tubular bells. Search Google for "Richard Branson publicity stunt" to see what I mean. Scott A (...) (20 years ago, 27-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Virgin Galactic (was Re: Some good news for a change, maybe? —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | (...) (stuff about Virgin Galactic) Well, whether Branson is a publicity hound or not, the naysayers have come out: For example this one: (URL) was quite taken with his "even people like Nasa find it a challenge"... - It's NASA, not Nasa - NASA (...) (20 years ago, 28-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Virgin Galactic (was Re: Some good news for a change, maybe? —J. Spencer Rezkalla
| | | | | (...) Well you could try his webpage: (URL) I didn't read as much naysayer out of that as you did. It seems to me like a realistic assessment of the situation. However I suspect the writing context of the article is sloppy. I'm pretty sure some of (...) (20 years ago, 28-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
