Subject:
|
Re: False premise in this message needs to be identified as what it is
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:00:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1442 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Lee Meyer wrote:
| |
the point I was trying to make was that when you deal with a topic
that has moral/religious implications (such as homosexuality), if before the
|
There are no moral implications in the issue -- except for the immorality of
behaving in a hostile manner toward a harmless minority, of course.
| |
discussion has even begun, you state that religious factors will not be taken
into consideration on determining if something should or shouldn’t be done,
all I’m saying is that that is not a religion-neutral position - it is one
that is hostile (equally hostile towards all religions) to religion.
|
Out of curiosity, would it be more or less hostile to your particular religion
if Todd stated that LUGNET makes decisions based on, and in accordance with,
Malaysian animism? I think the religion-neutral stance that you’re claiming as
equally hostile to all religions is actually friendlier to every religion than
adopting any particular one would be except to that one.
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
151 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
