Subject:
|
Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:40:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1664 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
So, are you saying that heterosexuals in prison who engage in homosexual sex
are still heterosexuals? This is an interesting distinction and I have heard
it before among Latin men. They believe that they can have sex with a Gay
man (they, however, being the dominant partner) but still consider
themselves “straight”. This idea of separating orientation from behavior
doesn’t parse for me. These people are clearly bisexual.
|
It parsed with the ancient Greeks. It was considered socially acceptable for
mentors to engage in consensual acts with their also-male students, but only the
passive partner was considered to be gay. Also, I’ve heard theories stated that
the Bible speaks more towards which partner you are than whether you participate
in the act at all.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| (...) So, are you saying that heterosexuals in prison who engage in homosexual sex are still heterosexuals? This is an interesting distinction and I have heard it before among Latin men. They believe that they can have sex with a Gay man (they, (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
106 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
